So he's all in on Israel doing 9/11 but it's too much for them to shoot a guy who talks to college students? It's so beyond the pale that he has to disavow the theory on every (numerous) mainstream podcast appearance? Please.
He is saying, definitively, that Israel had nothing to do with it. How could he possibly know this? Why won't he litigate any of the facts?
If he simply didn't agree then he could just shut up about it and talk about something else. Instead, he's going to war over this.
Well, yeah. Exactly.
I just think the foreign policy is better evidence. It's more straightforward and throws his whole worldview into question. The Kirk stuff doesn't.
So he's all in on Israel doing 9/11 but it's too much for them to shoot a guy who talks to college students? It's so beyond the pale that he has to disavow the theory on every (numerous) mainstream podcast appearance? Please.
He is saying, definitively, that Israel had nothing to do with it. How could he possibly know this? Why won't he litigate any of the facts?
If he simply didn't agree then he could just shut up about it and talk about something else. Instead, he's going to war over this.