Historucally, minimum was wage was literally pushed as a living wage. Single men could buy property on what we now see called by pundits these, "starter jobs," which are increasingly dominated by 50+ workers, up into the 90s.
Really, any job that takes a majority of your waking hours should pay a living wage. Now mind you I'm much more saying that we need things like the removal of institutional investors in housing, a currency reset (but not to CBDCs), etc., not so much a high minimum wage. But, the idea that jobs which take time away from advancing from them, but pay too little to live off of, is somehow an OK thing, is BS. It's a symptom of a very broken system.
Historucally, minimum was wage was literally pushed as a living wage. Single men could buy property on what we now see called by pundits these, "starter jobs," which are increasingly dominated by 50+ workers, up into the 90s.
Really, any job that takes a majority of your waking hours should pay a living wage. Now mind you I'm much more saying that we need things like the removal of institutional investors in housing, a currency reset (but not to CBDCs), etc., not so much a high minimum wage. But, the idea that jobs which take time away from advancing from them, but pay too little to live off of, is somehow an OK thing, is BS. It's a symptom of a very broken system.