Interesting fact: commercial properties have a payback of ~10 years; so 10 years of rent, net of expenses, should pay the cost of the property.
No reason houses shouldn't be the same way, in that 10 years of equivalent rent (which includes maintenance expenses) should pay for the house. That's dreaming, for sure.
Interesting fact: commercial properties have a payback of ~10 years; so 10 years of rent, net of expenses, should pay the cost of the property.
No reason houses shouldn't be the same way, in that 10 years of equivalent rent (which includes maintenance expenses) should pay for the house. That's dreaming, for sure.