I think the problem is that while there is certainly a lot of circumstantial evidence, its still basing it all on "they both walk funny in the same manner" which isn't the type of CSI level groundbreaking proof people jump all over.
It also spends a chunk of the article treating Kyle Seraphin as their big quote machine. A "White Jew" (his own words) who calls criticism of him just like the Holocaust. His only big claim after being a totally badass FBI whistleblower was defending 764, the extremely horrific pedo cult that cropped up online in recent years, earlier this year with increasingly bizarre fervor and contradictions. Like, in a manner where it seemed panicked instead of principled but emotional. Which led to a bunch of guys who use the term "Woke Right" to take up his crusade after he ran away from it, including actual Federal Informant Enrique Tarrio running defense for him.
Which to anyone terminally online enough puts the entire credibility of the article to the test.
I can still completely believe that this dyke they are accusing was the bomber, as this article has brought a lot of other random facts out that keep putting together a picture that is quite damning. But in any other scenario most people here would be screaming about the Jew they are propping up in their big article, if they only knew what he was.
I think the problem is that while there is certainly a lot of circumstantial evidence, its still basing it all on "they both walk funny in the same manner" which isn't the type of CSI level groundbreaking proof people jump all over.
It also spends a chunk of the article treating Kyle Seraphin as their big quote machine. A "White Jew" (his own words) who calls criticism of him just like the Holocaust. His only big claim after being a totally badass FBI whistleblower was defending 764, the extremely horrific pedo cult that cropped up online in recent years, earlier this year with increasingly bizarre fervor and contradictions. Like, in a manner where it seemed panicked instead of principled but emotional. Which led to a bunch of guys who use the term "Woke Right" to take up his crusade after he ran away from it, including actual Federal Informant Enrique Tarrio running defense for him.
Which to anyone terminally online enough puts the entire credibility of the article to the test.
I can still completely believe that this dyke they are accusing was the bomber, as this article has brought a lot of other random facts out that keep putting together a picture that is quite damning. But in any other scenario most people here would be screaming about the Jew they are propping up in their big article, if they only knew what he was.