I don't consider that a valid question and here's why.
Pre-Christian Europe was barbarity and post-Christian Europe is degeneracy. The golden ages were when White Christian monarchs ruled their kingdoms in line with European Christian principles. To remove this element would be unilaterally harmful to White European peoples, as we can see in the post (((banker war))) era. Going back to, say, the Dionysian Mysteries would just be reinventing the wheel.
On that note I urge you to read St. John Chrysostom particularly his homilies against the jews. You might gain a valuable insight into the difference between genuine Christianity (based) and churchianity (gay and cucked).
I don't consider that a valid question and here's why.
It's a simply hypothetical question. It has nothing to do with our current situation and it's not a trick question. I want to know what your top priority is in life. Your blood or your religion.
If you had to forsake your religion to ensure the survival of your people, would you do it? Yes or no?
Again, I don't consider that valid because White European Christian identity is one concept. Remove one element and the entirety collapses.
If you're asking would I rather a European continent populated by White pagans or brown Christians the answer is unequivocally the former. Whites would rediscover Christ in our own time whereas muds would just revert to their hoodoo-santeria blood magic (but with crosses).
Again, I don't consider that valid because White European Christian identity is one concept.
I'm not talking about 'White European Christian identity'. I'm talking about blood. Genetics.
Christianity is taught. But you are born with your blood. You can convert non-Christians to Christianity. You can not convert non-Europeans into Europeans. That is the difference. An ideology spiritual or not is not a foundation of a people. Blood is the foundation. Europeans have existed for far longer than Christianity.
Considering that you are saying that an ideology is equal to the genetic makeup of a people I think I can assert your answer to the thought experiment that you refuse to participate in.
When you do not care for your genetic makeup if it is removed from your chosen religion then your religion is more important to you than your genetic makeup.
And that's exactly the point I was making. And the reason why I take issue with Christianity.
Europeans have existed for far longer than Christianity.
Once again - as barbarians, and without it as degenerates. It is not an "ideology" it is universal spiritual truth, as inherent in our bloodlines as our desire to reproduce with (White) women to carry on our race.
If you're still unconvinced after a (genuine good faith) effort to understand Christian Identity then I don't know what else to say.
I don't consider that a valid question and here's why.
Pre-Christian Europe was barbarity and post-Christian Europe is degeneracy. The golden ages were when White Christian monarchs ruled their kingdoms in line with European Christian principles. To remove this element would be unilaterally harmful to White European peoples, as we can see in the post (((banker war))) era. Going back to, say, the Dionysian Mysteries would just be reinventing the wheel.
On that note I urge you to read St. John Chrysostom particularly his homilies against the jews. You might gain a valuable insight into the difference between genuine Christianity (based) and churchianity (gay and cucked).
It's a simply hypothetical question. It has nothing to do with our current situation and it's not a trick question. I want to know what your top priority is in life. Your blood or your religion.
If you had to forsake your religion to ensure the survival of your people, would you do it? Yes or no?
Again, I don't consider that valid because White European Christian identity is one concept. Remove one element and the entirety collapses.
If you're asking would I rather a European continent populated by White pagans or brown Christians the answer is unequivocally the former. Whites would rediscover Christ in our own time whereas muds would just revert to their hoodoo-santeria blood magic (but with crosses).
I'm not talking about 'White European Christian identity'. I'm talking about blood. Genetics.
Christianity is taught. But you are born with your blood. You can convert non-Christians to Christianity. You can not convert non-Europeans into Europeans. That is the difference. An ideology spiritual or not is not a foundation of a people. Blood is the foundation. Europeans have existed for far longer than Christianity.
Considering that you are saying that an ideology is equal to the genetic makeup of a people I think I can assert your answer to the thought experiment that you refuse to participate in.
When you do not care for your genetic makeup if it is removed from your chosen religion then your religion is more important to you than your genetic makeup.
And that's exactly the point I was making. And the reason why I take issue with Christianity.
Once again - as barbarians, and without it as degenerates. It is not an "ideology" it is universal spiritual truth, as inherent in our bloodlines as our desire to reproduce with (White) women to carry on our race.
If you're still unconvinced after a (genuine good faith) effort to understand Christian Identity then I don't know what else to say.