Here is the actual video he is referring to. It's an hour long and so haven't had time to go through it fully but one of the key things I noted was around 21:00 she rejects gender representation in the Diet.
All in all, it's a better statement that the new pm points against ISLAMIC immigration to Japan than anything.
I think there's a bit of confusion, when I say 'diversity of opinion', I mean amongst those that CAN debate.
A monarchist, a conservative, A democracy advocate, A libertarian etc can all debate and even come to a consensus on issues.
Feminists DON'T debate, communists don't, leftists don't. They only seek subjugation so as such, can ONLY be treated as a hostile entity with no concessions.
Here is the actual video he is referring to. It's an hour long and so haven't had time to go through it fully but one of the key things I noted was around 21:00 she rejects gender representation in the Diet.
All in all, it's a better statement that the new pm points against ISLAMIC immigration to Japan than anything.
When has "diversity," "change" or "stop hate speech" ever worked out well in the past? Genuine question.
Diversity of opinion is the ONLY one that truly matters as the only reason we are having to go hardline is the opposing side rejects ALL debate.
Because we can, they can't.
I don't believe in diversity of political opinions for the workplace. If you're a feminist, you should be shut out.
Go ahead and disagree with me, but it's the bare minimum we need to claw our way back.
I think there's a bit of confusion, when I say 'diversity of opinion', I mean amongst those that CAN debate.
A monarchist, a conservative, A democracy advocate, A libertarian etc can all debate and even come to a consensus on issues.
Feminists DON'T debate, communists don't, leftists don't. They only seek subjugation so as such, can ONLY be treated as a hostile entity with no concessions.