The central point he's replying to is a guy saying high-powered women exec types are not very attractive, which is true. The two of them take this and somehow use it to stumble into false points, like 'waitresses are better' vs 'akshully upper middle class men prefer upper middle class women', when the debate should be about how feminism has ruined all women, which I think the original point comes closer to addressing.

You can't tell me that upper-middle-class men are comfortable making a move on womanbosses when HR departments and 'power imbalances' have become a thing that can ruin your life and career after a word from her. What 'culture' does he think is instilled into an empowered working woman, who headhunts wealthy men, that isn't further served by a nice big lucrative divorce? Like, yes I'm sure many waitresses see the world that way too, but why pretend the execs aren't even more cutthroat. Both pools are fucked, that's the point.