You're right. I disagree because I'm uncertain but I agree with him by saying they are spinning narratives and its doubtful it's just leftist violence and more likely involves a conspiracy.
I think where he loses people is when he tries to shield violent leftists, as if they cant be used to kill people or like they havent already killed people for political disagreements
Im sure that will be comforting when leftists are beating the shit out of him for being right of mao. I imagine thats how the dem activist who got stabbed by a black teen must have felt like .
I think you misunderstand ian Carroll but idk I don't watch a lot of his material. He seems to he focused on jq Israeli involvement, and not just focusing on "leftist" violence which is sort of a misnomer when identifying these proggolems.
You're right. I disagree because I'm uncertain but I agree with him by saying they are spinning narratives and its doubtful it's just leftist violence and more likely involves a conspiracy.
I think where he loses people is when he tries to shield violent leftists, as if they cant be used to kill people or like they havent already killed people for political disagreements
Its more like he's trying to point out that it's not as simple as proggolem violence which is the new rallying cry to clamp down on antisepticism.
Im sure that will be comforting when leftists are beating the shit out of him for being right of mao. I imagine thats how the dem activist who got stabbed by a black teen must have felt like .
I think you misunderstand ian Carroll but idk I don't watch a lot of his material. He seems to he focused on jq Israeli involvement, and not just focusing on "leftist" violence which is sort of a misnomer when identifying these proggolems.
So… it was a violent leftist; got it.