Nick Fuentes is preparing to sellout on Israel
(nitter.poast.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Did no one watch the interview? He said he was more concerned about Jews than Muslims due to their power right before this. He even says "gross positive" because he's acknowledging the negatives change the picture. What he's saying is there have been Jews who have contributed some positive things in the US, while Muslims have contributed nothing to America. I didn't blink twice when he said it, made total sense to me.
I agree that soundbite is one of the weakest demonstrations of Nick selling out.
A far stronger demonstration is Nick pooh-poohing claims of Israel's involvement in the Kirk shooting by knocking down the "$150M shekels to Charlie Kirk" claim that he himself started just 2 weeks ago. Incredibly, he then blamed Candace Owens and Max Blumenthal, who never said anything about $150M. It doesn't get more obvious than that folks.
Are you sure about that? I thought Max reported the 150m part and Candace and someone else had just said he turned money down. I don't remember Fuentes being the source of 150m claim. I do think it's weird how quickly he dismissed the Israel theory though.
Not that I've seen. Max published 2 major articles I've read on Kirk and neither mentioned the funding amount, as far as I can tell. On the other hand Nick's own fanpage still has the clip published where he says "$150M."
It's been a hectic last couple weeks, I swear I thought the 150m figure came from someone reputable (as in close to Charlie, or like Max reporting from a source close to him). Thanks for correcting that, hate when I repeat bad info
The clip where he's rationalizing siding with Jews is more damaging than the other clip.