Another data point showing Goolag's AI lying about Charlie Kirk's murder
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Stop badgering the AI. It doesn't prove anything, and makes you look like an immature child. The AI only has access to data within its training set. Obviously this set ends well before Charlie Kirk's assassination. It's also designed to mimic tone. If you come at it with a combative statement, it will push back.
This is proves nothing, it's just a tool behaving like anyone who understands how it works would expect.
A quick google search could have told you this particular model was released in June, and the actual data from the model shows that it's training data ends in January.
These things aren't magic.
There is a growing divide between the people who do believe it's magic omnecent god-like being, and those who push back against that specific belief.
Somewhere in the middle is the people who actually understand what an LLM is, what it's capabilities and uses are, while the two extremes get harder and harder to even have a conversation with.
That's just called being stupid.
And what are the people who argue against that concept like they are actually going to win a prize for proving the AI is not omniscient?