There is a growing divide between the people who do believe it's magic omnecent god-like being, and those who push back against that specific belief.
Somewhere in the middle is the people who actually understand what an LLM is, what it's capabilities and uses are, while the two extremes get harder and harder to even have a conversation with.
There is a growing divide between the people who do believe it's magic omnecent god-like being, and those who push back against that specific belief.
Somewhere in the middle is the people who actually understand what an LLM is, what it's capabilities and uses are, while the two extremes get harder and harder to even have a conversation with.
That's just called being stupid.
And what are the people who argue against that concept like they are actually going to win a prize for proving the AI is not omniscient?
Also stupid people, just stupid people who happen not to be wrong on this particular issue.
I should know, I like to fight on the internet like I'm going to win a prize for it. We have our vices.
I got all my prizes 20 years ago, and try pretty hard not to bother most of the time, but old habbits and all.
Someone needs to do a bit about the horseshoe theory of stupidity, and the dialogue around AI is prime material for it.