And, oh god. They would absolutely call Long a Fascist when they saw his anti-crime policy. If he took one look at any New Orleans and just be like, "Well that dog just don't hunt! Aw ight. We goin' clear it out tonight. Rattle 'em, boys!"
Yes, there is a brain worm in the "lib-dem" if I can describe people by a british party, which makes them think that the "experts" know literally everything, when in reality they are about as well informed, or more so, than the people they are listening to.
It is possible that a technocracy could exist, but it would have to exist with a level of such high integrity for civil governance that it would be near utopian. Unfortunately, technocracy has always been a Socialist pipe-dream and rationalization of political power. They always claimed that Socialism and Communism were the only "rational" way to run things, and it was persuasive in 1890, but sure as shit not any more.
And, oh god. They would absolutely call Long a Fascist when they saw his anti-crime policy. If he took one look at any New Orleans and just be like, "Well that dog just don't hunt! Aw ight. We goin' clear it out tonight. Rattle 'em, boys!"
Yes, there is a brain worm in the "lib-dem" if I can describe people by a british party, which makes them think that the "experts" know literally everything, when in reality they are about as well informed, or more so, than the people they are listening to.
It is possible that a technocracy could exist, but it would have to exist with a level of such high integrity for civil governance that it would be near utopian. Unfortunately, technocracy has always been a Socialist pipe-dream and rationalization of political power. They always claimed that Socialism and Communism were the only "rational" way to run things, and it was persuasive in 1890, but sure as shit not any more.