Yes, the Zulu Kingdom, under King Dingane, betrayed the Boer settlers in 1838 by massacring Piet Retief and his delegation after luring them into Zulu lands and then attacking Boer camps in order to genocide them. This act of betrayal ignited a war known as the Battle of Blood River, where the Boers, using a fortified wagon laager(a fort created with wagons), successfully defended themselves against Zulu attacks, leading to a significant turning point in the conflict for land and control. That the Boers weren't violent colonizers. These Africans literally wanted to genocide white people just for existing in Africa. Now when the British came along, they learned about this. So that might explain why the British were the way they were in South Africa.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Imagine what a White Nationalist history curriculum would look like:
It wouldn't even be a white nationalist history curriculum necessarily. It would just be the truth. It's simply the truth. All truth seekers would be appreciating it. White nationalists just happens to be in a position where the truth is on their side. The truth is all races on Earth have done horrible shit since the dawn of time but white people are the least guilty.
It's not uncommon to have focused history courses that have specific topics. Successful White nations is a great thing to learn about.
Ironic that Rowanda is the history I don't know yet.
black people see other black people as inferior, decide to do a little genocide.