I had a friendly debate with a friend about this, this isn't about speech, it's a question of character.
If a person at the news of a person who has committed no crimes, not advocated violence, just debates and disagrees with them ideologically is publicly assassinated and their response is to not just celebrate it but publicly online GLOAT about it, would you want ANYTHING to do with them?
I wouldn't want them as a partner, a work colleague hell a friend or ANYTHING to do with children. They removed their mask and it was so vile that they DESERVE excommunication.
And that's why we can't coexist with radical leftist scum. Because to them, they see Charlie Kirk as evil, the same way we view their troon activists as evil. Their morality has become so twisted that they no longer see the opinions of Kirk as milquetoast "standard" GOP fare from the 2000's-2010's. They see him as a THREAT. They see his views as "extreme".
I had a friendly debate with a friend about this, this isn't about speech, it's a question of character.
If a person at the news of a person who has committed no crimes, not advocated violence, just debates and disagrees with them ideologically is publicly assassinated and their response is to not just celebrate it but publicly online GLOAT about it, would you want ANYTHING to do with them?
I wouldn't want them as a partner, a work colleague hell a friend or ANYTHING to do with children. They removed their mask and it was so vile that they DESERVE excommunication.
And that's why we can't coexist with radical leftist scum. Because to them, they see Charlie Kirk as evil, the same way we view their troon activists as evil. Their morality has become so twisted that they no longer see the opinions of Kirk as milquetoast "standard" GOP fare from the 2000's-2010's. They see him as a THREAT. They see his views as "extreme".
No bad tactics, only bad targets, as you know.