mostly just the 'moral equivalency'.

That was my primary focus anyway, but I would argue I got the others, too, at least in the ballpark. Antisemitism for sure, and "right to defend" somewhat, although admittedly not in the way I expected. Hamas wasn't explicitly mentioned, but the same reasoning was used, I'd argue:

because of "the neighborhood" and the circumstances it was established as an ethnostate with Jewish-specific privileges