A few days ago two Scottish girls were stalked and filmed by vibrant diversity, and one of the girls pulled a knife and an axe as a show of force to make them stop following them.
Women are all over themselves demanding to know why men won't protect them. Enter Andrew Wilson with this post:
Archive: https://archive.is/JhhiC
X: https://x.com/paleochristcon/status/1960384081302110324
It is like someone set off a nuke on X.
Andrew is 100% correct.
Women voted in the governments that penalize men who defend society. America took its philosophy of self defense from Britain before the revolutionary war, but in Britain, self defense has been made all but illegal. Women voted for that, over and over again.
And now, with millions of turd worlders flooding their nations, and bringing their attitudes about SA and rape with them, these women still expect men to defend them, and take the prison sentences when they do?
Nah, ladies. Your mothers and grandmothers voted for this. Take it up with them.
Arguably, nobody voted for the current immigration regime in Britain. So I don't know if that makes sense, as weird as it sounds.
Also, per Andrew's specific point, UK girls have been "dealing" with it for decades now, and nothing has changed. In fact things have gotten worse.
I think a message of "let men protect you again" with tangible goals (some kind of Good Samaritan protection?) would be more effective than "haha you got raped." What if some municipality passed a law that provided immunity to men interfering with harassment and rape incidents?