Edit: Then made a closing reference that the EU was perfectly fine being cucked by Russia & Ukraine by not demanding an "exclusive" relationship.
To be fair, it was more painted as the West being the cucker, not the cuck. After all, the premise was Ukraine was already Russia's, so if we're "non-exclusive", it's still Big Bad Russia that is losing. We're just tricking them, but they're the cucks in his analogy.
"We" didn't demand exclusivity, because we were tricking those stupid cucked Russians, is the argument.
Simply put, if you're fucking someone's girlfriend, you gain from them being non-exclusive, not the previous boyfriend. You're not the cuck for fucking someone else's girl. His whole argument is that we were taking Russian's chick.
Telling that Gideon Rose used an analogy painting Russia as Tyrone from the hood & the EU as being yuppie "husband material".
Edit: Then made a closing reference that the EU was perfectly fine being cucked by Russia & Ukraine by not demanding an "exclusive" relationship.
To be fair, it was more painted as the West being the cucker, not the cuck. After all, the premise was Ukraine was already Russia's, so if we're "non-exclusive", it's still Big Bad Russia that is losing. We're just tricking them, but they're the cucks in his analogy.
"We" didn't demand exclusivity, because we were tricking those stupid cucked Russians, is the argument.
Simply put, if you're fucking someone's girlfriend, you gain from them being non-exclusive, not the previous boyfriend. You're not the cuck for fucking someone else's girl. His whole argument is that we were taking Russian's chick.