Bro, is it really an issue to play other civilizations, including primitive ones? You can do that in EU4 too. I feel like this is complaining that you can play Liberia in HOI4.
I'm sure the Aztec are going to be in the game, but I'm not sure why that's a problem. It might even be possible to conquer the Earth as the Aztec, but I'm willing to bet it will be some goofy-as-fuck way of somehow conquering Spain or Portugal, and then relocating the Azetc capital to Madrid. I get that we're concerned about DEI nonsense, but where are we actually seeing it, and how has it different from EU4?
Well, faggot, it's because I don't see representation for Europe in a game historically centered on them. Why does some savage Aztec with his distinctive stick-with-rock-shards-in-it get a prominent placement among those six statues instead of say... a Spanish Conquistador?
But it's still going to be centered on them because it's still covering the most interesting time of European consolidation and expansion.
Why does some savage Aztec with his distinctive stick-with-rock-shards-in-it get a prominent placement among those six statues instead of say... a Spanish Conquistador?
Because the Devs are literally advertising that they've expanded the potential nations you can play at the start. The trailer is pointing out a feature.
Again, do you have anything that would cause us to think that there's something actually DEI related to this game?
No, it isn't evidence because it's a trailer advertising a feature.
This is the exact type of behavior that gets shit on when people over-react to seeing a woman in a trailer. It negates the actual infiltration into gaming when you're wrong, and causes a loss of credibility. When you saw the Sydney Sweeny jeans ad, were you screeching about the feminization of men?
Save your outrage for Pan-Gender restrooms in Dead Space, not "non-European factions are playable in EU5, just like in EU4".
Bro, is it really an issue to play other civilizations, including primitive ones? You can do that in EU4 too. I feel like this is complaining that you can play Liberia in HOI4.
I'm sure the Aztec are going to be in the game, but I'm not sure why that's a problem. It might even be possible to conquer the Earth as the Aztec, but I'm willing to bet it will be some goofy-as-fuck way of somehow conquering Spain or Portugal, and then relocating the Azetc capital to Madrid. I get that we're concerned about DEI nonsense, but where are we actually seeing it, and how has it different from EU4?
Well, faggot, it's because I don't see representation for Europe in a game historically centered on them. Why does some savage Aztec with his distinctive stick-with-rock-shards-in-it get a prominent placement among those six statues instead of say... a Spanish Conquistador?
I mean, I know why. And, obviously, so do you.
But it's still going to be centered on them because it's still covering the most interesting time of European consolidation and expansion.
Because the Devs are literally advertising that they've expanded the potential nations you can play at the start. The trailer is pointing out a feature.
Again, do you have anything that would cause us to think that there's something actually DEI related to this game?
The near total lack of Europeans in a Europa Universalis trailer isn't evidence?
Let me guess, it's not happening, and if it was it would be a good thing.
This is the wrong place to be a niggerfaggot.
No, it isn't evidence because it's a trailer advertising a feature.
This is the exact type of behavior that gets shit on when people over-react to seeing a woman in a trailer. It negates the actual infiltration into gaming when you're wrong, and causes a loss of credibility. When you saw the Sydney Sweeny jeans ad, were you screeching about the feminization of men?
Save your outrage for Pan-Gender restrooms in Dead Space, not "non-European factions are playable in EU5, just like in EU4".