There are plenty of other bad actors. It's just that this one group in particular holds the most negative animus toward Whites (only ones who support Affirmative Action more when it's explicitly framed as harming White interests e.g.)
It's just that this one group in particular holds the most negative animus toward Whites (only ones who support Affirmative Action more when it's explicitly framed as harming White interests e.g.)
Honestly, I don't know who you think you're fooling with this. We all know how pattern recognition works when we read a headline about "Man Attacked By Youths" or "European National drives a truck into a crowd while shouting 'God is Great' in Asian language (motives unclear)" so why do you persist in this charade when such an obviously disproportionate amount of support for open borders, LGBTQ+ insanity and Fake News in general comes from a "fellow White person" with a -berg/-witz/-baum/-stein surname?
It doesn't have to be all of them. It just has to be enough of them.
That's a Youtube video. And wow, what a huge increase, from 43% to 44%. One whole percentage point, out of a sub-sample size that is how large? Did you even wonder about these questions, or do you just believe whatever you hear? Your poll doesn't even show what you claim it does.
Also, it's interesting that Protestant opposition to AA went from 69% to 68% when they heard that it hurts whites.
And you people call others NPCs? You are the biggest NPCs out there.
Honestly, I don't know who you think you're fooling with this.
You're mostly fooling yourself, as is usual for NPCs.
so why do you persist in this charade when such an obviously disproportionate amount of support for open borders, LGBTQ+ insanity and Fake News in general comes from a "fellow White person" with a -berg/-witz/-baum/-stein surname?
What was the 'charade'? I asked you for a poll, and you started sperging out.
It doesn't have to be all of them. It just has to be enough of them.
There are plenty of other bad actors. It's just that this one group in particular holds the most negative animus toward Whites (only ones who support Affirmative Action more when it's explicitly framed as harming White interests e.g.)
Which poll was that?
Quinnipiac. Literal first result on a search.
Honestly, I don't know who you think you're fooling with this. We all know how pattern recognition works when we read a headline about "Man Attacked By Youths" or "European National drives a truck into a crowd while shouting 'God is Great' in Asian language (motives unclear)" so why do you persist in this charade when such an obviously disproportionate amount of support for open borders, LGBTQ+ insanity and Fake News in general comes from a "fellow White person" with a -berg/-witz/-baum/-stein surname?
It doesn't have to be all of them. It just has to be enough of them.
That's a Youtube video. And wow, what a huge increase, from 43% to 44%. One whole percentage point, out of a sub-sample size that is how large? Did you even wonder about these questions, or do you just believe whatever you hear? Your poll doesn't even show what you claim it does.
Also, it's interesting that Protestant opposition to AA went from 69% to 68% when they heard that it hurts whites.
And you people call others NPCs? You are the biggest NPCs out there.
You're mostly fooling yourself, as is usual for NPCs.
What was the 'charade'? I asked you for a poll, and you started sperging out.
To what?
You asked for a source and I gave you one.
Sure thing bud, keep pretending Qatar is the problem.
Constitute a pattern. Like "religion of peace" or "despite being only-" as mentioned.