Trump primarily wants to grow the economy of the US
I've been critical of Trump, but that's not even my point here. I'm not blaming Trump, even though he's POTUS and the buck stops with him...in theory.
No, my issue is that the government is so big and so bloated - and so dishonest - that they weren't even necessarily actively covering for Obama/Hillary. It was just the status quo. They were untouchable...until someone (maybe Trump, but probably not, maybe Tulsi, maybe Wiles, who knows) thought it would be a good distraction, and made them un-untouchable.
The knew Obama and Hillary were guilty. And hid that. Until they got orders to the contrary. That's my theory, at least. This shit doesn't just fall out of the sky. The fact that they know now, means they knew then as well.
I totally support going after them, too, for the record. But it's still a distraction, still a coverup. It's red meat for the people who wanted to see some elites go down, after Trump bungled (maybe? 4D chess isn't out of the question, I have no clue what's going on at this point) the Epstein thing.
The problem remains: It's been shown very clearly there are just some things that can't be exposed...and the fact that it seems like a bunch of pedophiles and worse are running the show and are actually untouchable, even compared to Obama...that's a big problem for the system, and trust of said system.
Even jailing Obama - which I doubt will happen - does not solve the 'pedophiles seemingly run the world, and even the President of the US can't go after them' issue. In fact, jailing Obama as a distraction just shows how important the actual masters are.
Trump dangled the Epstein thing, he has to follow through. Going after other guilty parties like Obama and Hillary is great, but doesn't solve the actual issue, and actually highlights them more.
Someone worm-tonged their way into Trump's ear and told him the Dems would use the Epstein case to drag him through the mud.
Seems to be the case, yeah.
But it appears like some blonde retard isn't communicating that very well, and Suzie Wiles is intentionally corrupting everything she can touch.
Yeah, Wiles is deep, deep, deep in this.
And I think Trump knows. It's weird he keeps calling her 'perhaps the most powerful person on the planet.' That's...odd. Strange. Bizarre.
Trump has been more cagey and indirect in a really aggressive way, particularly with the Maxwell stuff. He's being expressly non-committal which is keeping not only his opponents guessing, but all of us as well.
I don't think that it's evidence that there are people that are untouchable, I think it's more like a decentralized version of what Stalin and Saddam did. Stalin made sure that he gave orders that specific people would assassinate other people so that they would be implicated in the murders. Saddam directlyhad his own party members execute the party members he ordered purged. The utility of this means that everybody in a position of power is explicitly implicated in the same crime as everybody else, and everyone is guilty, and anyone who speaks out against the conspiracy will be targeted by the other co-conspirators who need to be silenced to protect everyone else in the conspiracy.
Except instead of murder, it's child sex trafficking. So many are guilty of allowing, ignoring, tolerating, facilitating, or participating in the conspiracy that it makes the conspiracy either permanent, or a total collapse. If you speak the truth, everyone will hunt you down because everyone is guilty. If you everyone speaks the truth, then the whole system collapses on itself and everyone loses everything. Even if you know it's true, everyone just pretends that it isn't.
I think that's really what they found. The western, rainbow-flag, version of Saddam's coup; except without a Saddam. It's just the concentration of power itself. For the cost of killing Saddam and his system, you got the rise of Al-Qaeda, and 300,000 dead Iraqis. Was the Arab Spring really worth it? If you kill the Fabian Order, what happens next?
Unfortunately, I agree with Peter Hitchens on this. Destroying Saddam's system might actually be fucking worth it from a moral stance alone. I think the destruction of the Fabian Order might actually be better than letting it continue. Even if that risks causing a French Civil War, an anti-English Intafada, an invasion of Taiwan, and a 2nd Great Depression.
I've been critical of Trump, but that's not even my point here. I'm not blaming Trump, even though he's POTUS and the buck stops with him...in theory.
No, my issue is that the government is so big and so bloated - and so dishonest - that they weren't even necessarily actively covering for Obama/Hillary. It was just the status quo. They were untouchable...until someone (maybe Trump, but probably not, maybe Tulsi, maybe Wiles, who knows) thought it would be a good distraction, and made them un-untouchable.
The knew Obama and Hillary were guilty. And hid that. Until they got orders to the contrary. That's my theory, at least. This shit doesn't just fall out of the sky. The fact that they know now, means they knew then as well.
I totally support going after them, too, for the record. But it's still a distraction, still a coverup. It's red meat for the people who wanted to see some elites go down, after Trump bungled (maybe? 4D chess isn't out of the question, I have no clue what's going on at this point) the Epstein thing.
The problem remains: It's been shown very clearly there are just some things that can't be exposed...and the fact that it seems like a bunch of pedophiles and worse are running the show and are actually untouchable, even compared to Obama...that's a big problem for the system, and trust of said system.
Even jailing Obama - which I doubt will happen - does not solve the 'pedophiles seemingly run the world, and even the President of the US can't go after them' issue. In fact, jailing Obama as a distraction just shows how important the actual masters are.
Trump dangled the Epstein thing, he has to follow through. Going after other guilty parties like Obama and Hillary is great, but doesn't solve the actual issue, and actually highlights them more.
Seems to be the case, yeah.
Yeah, Wiles is deep, deep, deep in this.
And I think Trump knows. It's weird he keeps calling her 'perhaps the most powerful person on the planet.' That's...odd. Strange. Bizarre.
Trump has been more cagey and indirect in a really aggressive way, particularly with the Maxwell stuff. He's being expressly non-committal which is keeping not only his opponents guessing, but all of us as well.
I don't think that it's evidence that there are people that are untouchable, I think it's more like a decentralized version of what Stalin and Saddam did. Stalin made sure that he gave orders that specific people would assassinate other people so that they would be implicated in the murders. Saddam directly had his own party members execute the party members he ordered purged. The utility of this means that everybody in a position of power is explicitly implicated in the same crime as everybody else, and everyone is guilty, and anyone who speaks out against the conspiracy will be targeted by the other co-conspirators who need to be silenced to protect everyone else in the conspiracy.
Except instead of murder, it's child sex trafficking. So many are guilty of allowing, ignoring, tolerating, facilitating, or participating in the conspiracy that it makes the conspiracy either permanent, or a total collapse. If you speak the truth, everyone will hunt you down because everyone is guilty. If you everyone speaks the truth, then the whole system collapses on itself and everyone loses everything. Even if you know it's true, everyone just pretends that it isn't.
I think that's really what they found. The western, rainbow-flag, version of Saddam's coup; except without a Saddam. It's just the concentration of power itself. For the cost of killing Saddam and his system, you got the rise of Al-Qaeda, and 300,000 dead Iraqis. Was the Arab Spring really worth it? If you kill the Fabian Order, what happens next?
Unfortunately, I agree with Peter Hitchens on this. Destroying Saddam's system might actually be fucking worth it from a moral stance alone. I think the destruction of the Fabian Order might actually be better than letting it continue. Even if that risks causing a French Civil War, an anti-English Intafada, an invasion of Taiwan, and a 2nd Great Depression.