Your dick getting hard to the rape of kids, animals, and siblings isn't a protected right and despite what (((they))) tell you its far from free speech
Ahhh ok. So should a company be forced to perform a transaction if its for actual child porn, rape porn, or incest porn? Since you are viewing this possibly through an anarcho-pedophilist lens, should they allow the purchase of people? Help me understand where a company or credit group should draw the line if it isn't to just what is and what isn't legal
Your dick getting hard to the rape of kids, animals, and siblings isn't a protected right and despite what (((they))) tell you its far from free speech
Fuck off, and address my point.
Credit agencies have no right in blocking protected things such as speech and 2nd amendment issues.
Fucking kids, animals, and family members isn't a protected right.
Should companies and individuals be forced to cooperate with people performing and/or supporting digital support of illegal acts?
Yes, they should be forced to do their job and conduct transactions.
Ahhh ok. So should a company be forced to perform a transaction if its for actual child porn, rape porn, or incest porn? Since you are viewing this possibly through an anarcho-pedophilist lens, should they allow the purchase of people? Help me understand where a company or credit group should draw the line if it isn't to just what is and what isn't legal