Ahhh ok. So should a company be forced to perform a transaction if its for actual child porn, rape porn, or incest porn? Since you are viewing this possibly through an anarcho-pedophilist lens, should they allow the purchase of people? Help me understand where a company or credit group should draw the line if it isn't to just what is and what isn't legal
We will have to agree to disagree. You cant force a company to interact with you against their terms of service. Its like calling an Uber to be a getaway driver.
Credit agencies have no right in blocking protected things such as speech and 2nd amendment issues.
Fucking kids, animals, and family members isn't a protected right.
Should companies and individuals be forced to cooperate with people performing and/or supporting digital support of illegal acts?
Yes, they should be forced to do their job and conduct transactions.
Ahhh ok. So should a company be forced to perform a transaction if its for actual child porn, rape porn, or incest porn? Since you are viewing this possibly through an anarcho-pedophilist lens, should they allow the purchase of people? Help me understand where a company or credit group should draw the line if it isn't to just what is and what isn't legal
Yes, it's not the job of the companies to act as the police.
We will have to agree to disagree. You cant force a company to interact with you against their terms of service. Its like calling an Uber to be a getaway driver.