Some libertarians are retarded on borders. Not the ones I like, promote, or would vote for. "Libertarian" is a broad tent, and some are retarded leftist Redditor faggots. I'd argue that they're not even libertarian, but that gets a bit Scotsman-y.
But there's also a libertarian argument for strong borders, and it's actually at the core of libertarianism; property rights. If a country is the property of its people, you should protect it. Just like it would be unjust to force someone to live in your house, your government letting people come live in your country is not libertarian. Especially if you're also forced to pay for it. The more rightwing libertarians are perfectly fine on the border question.
Some libertarians are retarded on borders. Not the ones I like, promote, or would vote for. "Libertarian" is a broad tent, and some are retarded leftist Redditor faggots. I'd argue that they're not even libertarian, but that gets a bit Scotsman-y.
But there's also a libertarian argument for strong borders, and it's actually at the core of libertarianism; property rights. If a country is the property of its people, you should protect it. Just like it would be unjust to force someone to live in your house, your government letting people come live in your country is not libertarian. Especially if you're also forced to pay for it. The more rightwing libertarians are perfectly fine on the border question.