Yeah that's why he brought up Epstein and his island when nobody was talking about it?
Guy had been convicted a decade earlier. Trump brought it up because Clinton was associated with Epstein, and he suggested that he was doing more than just be associated, which we now hear is TOTALLY FAKE.
Given that Epstein had no clients and no one else abused kids, doesn't Trump owe Clinton an apology for suggesting that Clinton was raping kids on that island?
Why did he ban Epstein from Mar-a-lago? Stiffed him on the bill?
They got in a fight that was completely unrelated to the raping.
Why didn't anyone release kompromat video of Trump shagging a 16-year old girl during his campaigns if it exists?
Not saying that it exists, but maybe because they can get him to do the deep state's bidding (bombing Iran, weaponizing Ukraine) by using it as leverage.
Not saying that it exists, but maybe because they can get him to do the deep state's bidding (bombing Iran, weaponizing Ukraine) by using it as leverage.
Lol because the deep state didn't throw the kitchen sink at him in his first term and both his reelection campaigns? He was such a bad option for them that they tried to kill him twice.
If you try to throw a guy in prison and then have him killed, you're not going to hold blackmail material in reserve.
Lol because the deep state didn't throw the kitchen sink at him in his first term and both his reelection campaigns?
Did it? I'm not sure I know the extent of "the kitchen sink" for the deep state. But they certainly didn't bring up his public connection to Epstein. That may be because their own people were vulnerable though.
He was such a bad option for them that they tried to kill him twice.
I posed this question earlier: "Why would you brave 2 impeachments, 91 indictments, 2 assassination attempts, only to give the people doing that everything they wanted?"
If you try to throw a guy in prison and then have him killed, you're not going to hold blackmail material in reserve.
Maybe? Everyone needs a Plan B. If they are blackmailing him, it's working very well. If they're not blackmailing him, he's doing the stuff they want (bomb Iran, Ukraine, suppress Epstein List) without being blackmailed. Which is worse?
(I'm not saying there is blackmail material. But I can't help but wonder, and I have been wondering for 1.5 months since his Iran nonsense.)
Did it? I'm not sure I know the extent of "the kitchen sink" for the deep state. But they certainly didn't bring up his public connection to Epstein. That may be because their own people were vulnerable though.
Again: what is the value of blackmail if you can't use it?
Assuming it exists, who says they're not using it? Why has Trump II been a neocon's fever dream after running against neocons and warmongers? That could explain it.
If I were holding blackmail archives of the deep state, I'd use 91 indictments to prevent Trump from getting elected, but just in case he is elected, then I'd want an ace up my sleeve rather than have him be a truly free agent.
Guy had been convicted a decade earlier. Trump brought it up because Clinton was associated with Epstein, and he suggested that he was doing more than just be associated, which we now hear is TOTALLY FAKE.
Given that Epstein had no clients and no one else abused kids, doesn't Trump owe Clinton an apology for suggesting that Clinton was raping kids on that island?
They got in a fight that was completely unrelated to the raping.
Not saying that it exists, but maybe because they can get him to do the deep state's bidding (bombing Iran, weaponizing Ukraine) by using it as leverage.
Lol because the deep state didn't throw the kitchen sink at him in his first term and both his reelection campaigns? He was such a bad option for them that they tried to kill him twice.
If you try to throw a guy in prison and then have him killed, you're not going to hold blackmail material in reserve.
Did it? I'm not sure I know the extent of "the kitchen sink" for the deep state. But they certainly didn't bring up his public connection to Epstein. That may be because their own people were vulnerable though.
I posed this question earlier: "Why would you brave 2 impeachments, 91 indictments, 2 assassination attempts, only to give the people doing that everything they wanted?"
Maybe? Everyone needs a Plan B. If they are blackmailing him, it's working very well. If they're not blackmailing him, he's doing the stuff they want (bomb Iran, Ukraine, suppress Epstein List) without being blackmailed. Which is worse?
(I'm not saying there is blackmail material. But I can't help but wonder, and I have been wondering for 1.5 months since his Iran nonsense.)
Again: what is the value of blackmail if you can't use it?
Assuming it exists, who says they're not using it? Why has Trump II been a neocon's fever dream after running against neocons and warmongers? That could explain it.
If I were holding blackmail archives of the deep state, I'd use 91 indictments to prevent Trump from getting elected, but just in case he is elected, then I'd want an ace up my sleeve rather than have him be a truly free agent.