Women don't need additional head coverings besides just keeping their hair long.
Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
1 Corinthians 11:14-15
It's irrelevant if Catholics, Orthodox, and Muslims argue over which of their man-made traditions came first.
Coincidentally I'm reading through 1 Cor. According to my Archaeology Bible starting from v10: "Women were to cover their heads because in the first century a woman with uncovered hair was signaling that she was single or sexually available, thereby shaming her husband...In Greco-Roman culture, long hair on a man was the hairstyle of a juvenile or barbarian; it signaled an effeminate, weak man, easily conquered."
If you can't point to a scripture that says a woman should cover her head, then it's a man-made tradition that Christians are not obligated to respect.
Women don't need additional head coverings besides just keeping their hair long.
1 Corinthians 11:14-15
It's irrelevant if Catholics, Orthodox, and Muslims argue over which of their man-made traditions came first.
Coincidentally I'm reading through 1 Cor. According to my Archaeology Bible starting from v10: "Women were to cover their heads because in the first century a woman with uncovered hair was signaling that she was single or sexually available, thereby shaming her husband...In Greco-Roman culture, long hair on a man was the hairstyle of a juvenile or barbarian; it signaled an effeminate, weak man, easily conquered."
If you can't point to a scripture that says a woman should cover her head, then it's a man-made tradition that Christians are not obligated to respect.