I think this is on topic for this community, doesn't seem to break any rules, apologies if it isn't.
Their graph is a bit confusing, because it
A) Doesn't have specific numbers, but does have a scale.
B)The horizonal scale is by month, but the vertical is perhaps adjusted so that the monthly increase is normalized to the annual increase (It has "annualized" in fine print). Whether they do this by multiplying the increase by 12 or raising the ratio to the twelfth power, I am not sure.
It also isn't clear what period the 0.25% decrease in GDP is over. But no matter how I figure the period, the population increase seems to be at least 0.29% higher, if not closer to 1% higher if you base it on the early months of 2024 vs the early months of 2025. Hence my use of "more than that"
Honestly though, even if it did hurt the GDP per capita, it would be worth it.
I think this is on topic for this community, doesn't seem to break any rules, apologies if it isn't.
Their graph is a bit confusing, because it
A) Doesn't have specific numbers, but does have a scale.
B)The horizonal scale is by month, but the vertical is perhaps adjusted so that the monthly increase is normalized to the annual increase (It has "annualized" in fine print). Whether they do this by multiplying the increase by 12 or raising the ratio to the twelfth power, I am not sure.
It also isn't clear what period the 0.25% decrease in GDP is over. But no matter how I figure the period, the population increase seems to be at least 0.29% higher, if not closer to 1% higher if you base it on the early months of 2024 vs the early months of 2025. Hence my use of "more than that"
Honestly though, even if it did hurt the GDP per capita, it would be worth it.
Anytime you see globalist propaganda, it is on topic here. We need more people posting shit like this, so definitely keep it up.