The only reason not to agree with this is that the eurocrats in the EU commission have the final say in how the law based on the initiative will be written, given how well written is every EU law related to anything remotely tech. Could very well be so vague that it's useless, or force publishers to provide more support than the Ross originally intended(like if the underlying DRM stops supporting the original OSes mentioned on the requirements like many 2000s steam games became unplayable on XP, Vista and 7 due to Steam not supporting those OSes anymore; sure you can crack them or play them on newer hardware but online DRM can also be interpreted as "phone home" despite not being operated by the game developer/publisher).
Ross even says as much, that the EU commision has the final word on how the law would turn out before being sent to the EU parliament for the rubber stamp.
The only reason not to agree with this is that the eurocrats in the EU commission have the final say in how the law based on the initiative will be written, given how well written is every EU law related to anything remotely tech. Could very well be so vague that it's useless, or force publishers to provide more support than the Ross originally intended(like if the underlying DRM stops supporting the original OSes mentioned on the requirements like many 2000s steam games became unplayable on XP, Vista and 7 due to Steam not supporting those OSes anymore; sure you can crack them or play them on newer hardware but online DRM can also be interpreted as "phone home" despite not being operated by the game developer/publisher).
Ross even says as much, that the EU commision has the final word on how the law would turn out before being sent to the EU parliament for the rubber stamp.