According to Van Jones, an ignorant blowhard and ruling class ideologue on the fake news network CNN, Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, and the reason for that is that they say "death to all the Jews".
FACT CHECK: pants on fire.
REALITY: Iran has never said anything about "the Jews", let alone that they should all die. In fact, Iran has the largest Jewish minority in the Middle East after Israel, and it's not because the government has not been able to find them.
Iran makes a distinction between Judaism, which they regard as a religion, and Zionism, which they regard as a political ideology that they oppose. To quote Khamenei, the current Supreme Leader of Iran:
There are Jews living in various countries;in Iran Jews live respectably 'cuz its their own country but #Zionism is different from #Judaism. source
Quite a far cry from "death to all the Jews".
But I guess all's fair in manufacturing consent for senseless wars. And this guy is supposedly a "radical". And yet here he is lying for the war machine.
I was curious, and looked it up.
I know AI isn't reliable, but it is an interesting and easy yardstick. If there was easily accessible information, it would pull it up. It didn't. So I'm inclined to agree; media can't point to Iran saying "death to the Jews."
Brave results (condensed by me):
As the kids say: LOL, LMAO, EVEN.
They have nothing. Essentially: "They don't say death to the Jews, but they don't like Israel, and that's totally the same thing."
Considering the other bullshit this pulled up, I'd need to see specific examples of the "dehumanizing language," and who it was really directed toward.
Result 1: Brave says no, Iran doesn't say death to the Jews.
Google (again condensed by me):
I fucking hate AI-speak. What does that initial paragraph even me? Nothing, basically. It's just wishy-washy nonsense.
Stopping you right there, Google. Moving on.
So, no. No, Iran does not say "Death to the Jews."
I mean, didn't the House pass a law defining saying that Christ was killed by Jews as anti-Semitism? Such conflation are commonplace nowadays, and perhaps always have been (I'm rereading Mearsheimer's Israel Lobby).
Regime change, if you will. Good when the deep state does it, bad when others call for it.
There may well be some nutjobs who attack Jews. But I don't think that marginal people qualifies as "Iran" saying that, no more than you can say that the Israeli state approves of the actions of Dr. Baruch Goldstein because the Minister of the Interior Ben Ghvir does/did. It would have to be someone or an institution able to speak for the state.