Nick Fuentes is basically the only right wing voice which is unapologetically condemning war with Iran and critisizing Trump for it.
Dude, get out of your own way. As someone very Zionist-critical, and even somewhat Jew-critical, this is counterproductive nonsense.
Fuentes is a retard. Right on some things, but just ridiculous on others.
Now Tucker, he has been extremely consistent on this. He also has much more reach (not that that matters in the moral argument) and recently destroyed Ted Cruz (R-Israel) in a glorious fashion.
Heck, Charlie Kirk, a Zionist himself, has been largely on the right side of this, and said no war. He polled his followers, and they're 90% against war with Iran too.
Rand Paul, Thomas Massie, MTG, have all said no war with Iran. They're actually in government, and have some small power amidst the neocons.
And, while not explicitly on the right, libertarians like Dave Smith, Clint Russel, Scott Horton, and all the rest have also condemned this, and absolutely have the receipts to prove their points.
Sorry, but pushing Fuentes as the head of (or even "the only right wing pundit" on) the anti-war right wing movement is a self-own. Is Fuentes right on some things? Sure. Is he the definitive voice. HELL no. Get out of here with that.
I'd take Tucker, the sane Republicans, or the right-leaning libertarians over Fuentes every day of the week.
OP, I'll gladly rally with you in decrying war with Iran. But I'm not going to stand behind Nick Fuentes on this as the sole authority. Because he isn't. He's a relatively newcomer, at that.
Fuentes has been around for at least 10 years. He appeals to a younger audience than the people you named. He has been relentlessly attacked and censored for years, not to mention someone went to his house to assassinate him.
No need to bash him. He was singled out by the Zionist media because he is effective. The more voices speaking out against war the better.
Dude, get out of your own way. As someone very Zionist-critical, and even somewhat Jew-critical, this is counterproductive nonsense.
Fuentes is a retard. Right on some things, but just ridiculous on others.
Now Tucker, he has been extremely consistent on this. He also has much more reach (not that that matters in the moral argument) and recently destroyed Ted Cruz (R-Israel) in a glorious fashion.
Heck, Charlie Kirk, a Zionist himself, has been largely on the right side of this, and said no war. He polled his followers, and they're 90% against war with Iran too.
Rand Paul, Thomas Massie, MTG, have all said no war with Iran. They're actually in government, and have some small power amidst the neocons.
And, while not explicitly on the right, libertarians like Dave Smith, Clint Russel, Scott Horton, and all the rest have also condemned this, and absolutely have the receipts to prove their points.
Sorry, but pushing Fuentes as the head of (or even "the only right wing pundit" on) the anti-war right wing movement is a self-own. Is Fuentes right on some things? Sure. Is he the definitive voice. HELL no. Get out of here with that.
I'd take Tucker, the sane Republicans, or the right-leaning libertarians over Fuentes every day of the week.
OP, I'll gladly rally with you in decrying war with Iran. But I'm not going to stand behind Nick Fuentes on this as the sole authority. Because he isn't. He's a relatively newcomer, at that.
Fuentes has been around for at least 10 years. He appeals to a younger audience than the people you named. He has been relentlessly attacked and censored for years, not to mention someone went to his house to assassinate him.
No need to bash him. He was singled out by the Zionist media because he is effective. The more voices speaking out against war the better.