An Application Fee for asylum is a bit rough, and $1,000 for asylum is also rough, but a lot of Asylum-seekers are sponsored by NGO who will probably front that.
Meh, this will basically force people to choose a different option if the US system is taking too long. It's a little crass, but I'm not going to say it's wrong.
That's heavy charge, but I see it as a "shit or get off the pot" maneuver. Become a citizen, or go home. At 6 months, this won't effect any seasonal workers.
You got denied an appeal so now their charging you. I don't see this as a problem.
At-Will employment should be coerced onto bureaucrats. There shouldn't be a civil service protections AT ALL
I seriously doubt all of this. Most of the people losing medicare are people who are non-disabled adults who aren't seeking work. And they're just getting a mandatory work requirement, they shouldn't be covered at all.
Immigration enforcement is not bloat at the moment. That's like calling military funding bloat during a war. You know what eases infrastructure? 30 million less people.
Ohkay, listen, as a minarchist, I'm agreeing a lot with Rand Paul and Massie on their objections, even though I tend to agree that the bill needs to be passed to start moving in the right direction.
However, these are not exactly compelling arguments.
At-Will employment should be coerced onto bureaucrats. There shouldn't be a civil service protections AT ALL
You need some kind of framework that makes it legal to discuss and act on things like FBI crime statistics even when you have a libtard boss and illegal to be a libtard if you want things to get better. I do not know how you would be able to achieve this.
You can't. You actually need to have competing partisan actors that can be removed at will within one election cycle at all times.
Unfortunately, objectivity within politics is a non-starter. You have to have someone in one administration say, "hey, I'm not releasing data about the 'despite' numbers. When you win, I want a promise that with this study I won't get fired"
Ohkay, listen, as a minarchist, I'm agreeing a lot with Rand Paul and Massie on their objections, even though I tend to agree that the bill needs to be passed to start moving in the right direction.
However, these are not exactly compelling arguments.
You need some kind of framework that makes it legal to discuss and act on things like FBI crime statistics even when you have a libtard boss and illegal to be a libtard if you want things to get better. I do not know how you would be able to achieve this.
You can't. You actually need to have competing partisan actors that can be removed at will within one election cycle at all times.
Unfortunately, objectivity within politics is a non-starter. You have to have someone in one administration say, "hey, I'm not releasing data about the 'despite' numbers. When you win, I want a promise that with this study I won't get fired"