Short term-time preference is the biggest issue in addition to all the other failure of a modern western society. I don't think we live in a gynocentric society, I think "women's sexual empowerment" is one avenue of attack by Leftism (which is mostly men anyway).
If you don’t believe we live in a gynocentric society you are beyond retarded. The welfare state, forced gendered hiring, rights without responsibility, gender disparities in jail sentences, lowered physical standards, alimony, and kangaroo rape courts are amongst dozens of other government enforced gynocentrism.
Total fiction. Most Feminists of the era were opposed to what we have today, and most women weren't Feminists. Feminism has never been majority popular among women, even now. Most of these women's grand parents fully accepted the traditional gender roles, they just didn't see why political obstructions needed to be made to keep women from working.
This is hilarious revisionism. Most feminists of the era were pushing exactly for what we have today, which is gynocentric intersectionalism. You would have to be swallowing a metric ton of revision bullshit to believe the women pumping out 1 million plus abortions a year after roe just wanted “to work”. The grandparents today are the ones that collapsed the traditional gender roles.
There is a huge difference between, "I wanna be an engineer", and "50% of all engineers must be women, start firing men until we get to the right number."
I agree, and history shows it was never “I want to be an engineer” that was propaganda made after the fact to sell the removal gender roles. This is the same stupidity that was “gays just want to be married”, it might be pretty to believe but it was never the case and if you studied early feminism it’s blatantly obvious.
Calm down, imp. Short-term time preference and modern hedonism are not exclusively the domain of women and women alone. Being raised by only Dad, or by only Mom and Dad, doesn't negate the short-term time preference and hedonism that we're seeing. They're just less bad than single mothers.
“Dads aren’t important in the household to prevent female hypergamy” is this really the argument you want to make?
Now that's just silly. You don't lose the ability to pair bond simply by being old, or even promiscuous. It's difficult to do it because if someone hasn't been pair-bonding their whole life until their 40, then yes, they will struggle, but not because they lost a literal biological imperative.
“Pheromones, the endocrine system, and hormones don’t impact your ability to pair bond, it’s entirely psychological!” Really? At least try to make an argument this isn’t this pathetic at face value. Pair bonding is an inherent biological trait in social creatures. Promiscuity impacts the female endocrine system, it also impacts their ability to sense pheromones (which impacts their ability to pair bond), birth control does this and more as well.
If you don’t believe we live in a gynocentric society you are beyond retarded. The welfare state, forced gendered hiring, rights without responsibility, gender disparities in jail sentences, lowered physical standards, alimony, and kangaroo rape courts are amongst dozens of other government enforced gynocentrism.
This is hilarious revisionism. Most feminists of the era were pushing exactly for what we have today, which is gynocentric intersectionalism. You would have to be swallowing a metric ton of revision bullshit to believe the women pumping out 1 million plus abortions a year after roe just wanted “to work”. The grandparents today are the ones that collapsed the traditional gender roles.
I agree, and history shows it was never “I want to be an engineer” that was propaganda made after the fact to sell the removal gender roles. This is the same stupidity that was “gays just want to be married”, it might be pretty to believe but it was never the case and if you studied early feminism it’s blatantly obvious.
“Dads aren’t important in the household to prevent female hypergamy” is this really the argument you want to make?
“Pheromones, the endocrine system, and hormones don’t impact your ability to pair bond, it’s entirely psychological!” Really? At least try to make an argument this isn’t this pathetic at face value. Pair bonding is an inherent biological trait in social creatures. Promiscuity impacts the female endocrine system, it also impacts their ability to sense pheromones (which impacts their ability to pair bond), birth control does this and more as well.