I get that exist but to rely on it as objective fact and on top of that for the information to be brought to her by a fucking AI is bizzare. Which of the two is the Artificial Intelligence I wonder.
If there is a video there, it doesn't play in my browser. All I'm seeing is two images and a single sentence that mirrors your title with slight variants.
"A woman has filed for divorce after ChatGPT ‘analyzed’ her husband’s coffee to suggest that he’s cheating"
That's all I've got to go on. It's similar to your title minus the word 'grounds'.
Coffee ground reading is an actual thing. Look up Tasseography
It's like how they read tea leaves in Harry potter divination classes, which is also another real thing people actually do.
I get that exist but to rely on it as objective fact and on top of that for the information to be brought to her by a fucking AI is bizzare. Which of the two is the Artificial Intelligence I wonder.
One is AI. The other is No Intelligence
That may very well much be. But your link provides zero actual information to go on.
it does. if you actually clicked the link
If there is a video there, it doesn't play in my browser. All I'm seeing is two images and a single sentence that mirrors your title with slight variants.
That's all I've got to go on. It's similar to your title minus the word 'grounds'.
if you actually clicked on it, right below it is the article.
It's something people do, but I wouldn't exactly call it real.