Around the 18 minute mark, endymion suggests (as ridiculous) that game companies might start charging per match, but given the history of games, it's really not that bad of an idea, especially if it replaces the various lootcrates, pricing schemes, etc. we currently face. I dunno, what do you think? - Kotaku In Action 2

Around the 18 minute mark, endymion suggests (as ridiculous) that game companies might start charging per match, but given the history of games, it's really not that bad of an idea, especially if it replaces the various lootcrates, pricing schemes, etc. we currently face. I dunno, what do you think? (www.youtube.com)

posted 1 year ago by yeldarb1983 1 year ago by yeldarb1983 +19 / -0

57 comments

57 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (57)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– AlfredicEnglishRules 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I agree. They should have each game in its own box, with screen and controls ready. Then charge, say, a quarter per play. Let's have a big room in a prominent shopping area have a bunch of these games.

Naw, that's too archaic.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– yeldarb1983 [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

lol. I would love to see arcades make a revival.

that being said, I think an arcade style pricing scheme could work with modern online games.

permalink parent save report block reply