Nope. Context doesn't make it better.

What rights could women possible have, that men wouldn't or shouldn't get something equivalent?

Because the main TERF/tranny squabble seems to be about sex-segregated spaces.

So I think she's saying women have a legally protected right to have female only spaces, and men are not entitled to have male only spaces.

No matter the context, no matter how you slice it, it's just more feminist, female supremacist garbage.