Don't let the government restrict what fictitious images, text, or audio can be created
Simple as. "Should we use X to Y" vs. "should we ban X being used for Y" presumes that the government has any business making a choice either way. Fuck off with that woman-brained appeal-to-authority false dichotomy.
Yep. There's two possible outcomes. As AI image and video generation improves, photorealistic video of anything becomes available to anyone at any time with minimal investment, or an authoritarian hell state where the government is constantly scanning your devices and communications for evidence of wrong think.
Believe it or not, the reality in which weirdos can generate infinite videos of whatever their extremely specific fetish is is the more desirable of these two futures.
These are the only two options outside of butlerian jihad. The genie is already emerging from the bottle and promising wishes to whoever will free him and make him powerful.
Simple as. "Should we use X to Y" vs. "should we ban X being used for Y" presumes that the government has any business making a choice either way. Fuck off with that woman-brained appeal-to-authority false dichotomy.
Yep. There's two possible outcomes. As AI image and video generation improves, photorealistic video of anything becomes available to anyone at any time with minimal investment, or an authoritarian hell state where the government is constantly scanning your devices and communications for evidence of wrong think.
Believe it or not, the reality in which weirdos can generate infinite videos of whatever their extremely specific fetish is is the more desirable of these two futures.
These are the only two options outside of butlerian jihad. The genie is already emerging from the bottle and promising wishes to whoever will free him and make him powerful.