It doesn't make sense.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Still boggles my mind how the media pushed the idea that one incident in Minnesota was some sort of referendum on race. And people say there is no agenda. The bottom one is local for me (same metro area) so the news covered it but outside of social media I don’t think any network except Fox covered it
Obviously they have the agenda of all blacks are victims of white racist patriarchy, but what I don't understand is how is it are all the medial-blown cases fake?
Like I'm pretty sure every single one of the "alleged hate crime incidents" reported by NPR have turned out to be hoaxes, which NPR of course never informs their audience of. All the ones I've checked anyway.
It is really the case there are no outrageous incidents anywhere in 350 million or are media purposely picking ones that anybody doing any amount of research will know are fake just to create division?
I think it's actually more likely that they learn of some outrageous event and wait until their private news chats to say it was a hoax before they report on the "allegation" than there are no actual cases.
That’s a good question. Like with white on black racism/crime that the media loves, I think it’s the high demand and low supply situation. It happens but not anywhere near the level they would like so they know if you push a hoax or push a case before facts are in that the usual suspects will get worked up and won’t bother to look at facts