Sort of, yes. But he’s “against it” in a way that is completely backwards and ineffective on every level. He’s wrong about the driving causes, he’s wrong about the current political effects, he’s wrong about the solutions. It would actually be impossible to be more fully wrong while still being sort of in the ballpark of being right, to the point that I think anyone who counts him as an ally of any sort would find themselves more hampered than those treating him as an outright enemy.