What? Doesn't a citizen have written protections, as a citizen, against the state? Like they'd be entitled to proceedings that happen against them, as citizens, that attempt to prove that they aren't? I thought that you'd be innocent until proven guilty, at which time your citizenship would be revoked and you wouldn't be able to appeal because you are no longer a citizen.
If any of that is true, the argument is a false equivalence.
What? Doesn't a citizen have written protections, as a citizen, against the state? Like they'd be entitled to proceedings that happen against them, as citizens, that attempt to prove that they aren't? I thought that you'd be innocent until proven guilty, at which time your citizenship would be revoked and you wouldn't be able to appeal because you are no longer a citizen.
If any of that is true, the argument is a false equivalence.