There are no based conservative women. There are just women who have selected different pools of simps to grift from and have tailored their bait to be more appealing to their chosen pool.
This I think is stated a bit too strongly and broadly, though. In my opinion every woman has at least a sliver of feminism, usually much more. But that doesn't mean every antifeminist woman is a grifter. They might totally believe what they're saying, and be moderately "based." They might legitimately suppress that sliver of feminism. The danger is, when the right scenario confronts them (which can even just be as simple as time; if they get desperate for security, stability, children, what have you)...the feminism slips out. It's not a matter of grifting or lying, it's just a matter of their almost universal nature. It's not, per se, even a bad thing, it's just something you have to keep in mind.
The real issue is, they've been allowed and encouraged to run wild. It sounds super chauvinistic, but society used to keep women in check, and everyone was better off for it. Unchecked feminism is disaster, and if every woman is to some extent feminist...unchecked women is also a disaster.
In the old days, when 'men were men'...well, women were women. It was a different dynamic. Men absolutely got something out of it, because women were still fulfilling that role.
Andrew is spot on, although I think he could have stated some parts better and made it a clearer and more compelling argument.
But women on the right are just as feminist, but in a different way. Their entire deal is 'we're so traditional that we love the idea of a man supporting us and protecting us while we consume his resources, and he gets the joy of watching us live off of him'.
It's wild, and it's also crazy that 'go to war' was at the top of her list. She's willing to let us go fight and die for her, while openly saying she owes nothing. Much based, such trad.
You really don’t see based women because they are, first and foremost, not extroverted (aka attention-seeking). The only thing that reliably prompts public displays from based women is an attack on her man or her children.
This "clip" is 40 minutes long, that's hardly a clip. God forbid you link to the fucking line you are referring to. Nah, too much trouble so let's all watch 40 some minutes of a bunch of morons blathering. That's the ticket.
What kinda asshole even watches this dumb shit to get angry at it in the first place?
Using a mobile browser, not getting the timestamp, but do appreciate the reply. Ultimately, I simply don't care what any of these morons have to say in the first place, and can't figure out why anyone else does either.
Seems this video amounts to dumb woman says dumb thing, which is hardly news. If a woman has her mouth open, she's saying something idiotic, we hardly need video proof or a wider discussion about it.
Andrew seriously upsets these people. It’s great.
Correct.
This I think is stated a bit too strongly and broadly, though. In my opinion every woman has at least a sliver of feminism, usually much more. But that doesn't mean every antifeminist woman is a grifter. They might totally believe what they're saying, and be moderately "based." They might legitimately suppress that sliver of feminism. The danger is, when the right scenario confronts them (which can even just be as simple as time; if they get desperate for security, stability, children, what have you)...the feminism slips out. It's not a matter of grifting or lying, it's just a matter of their almost universal nature. It's not, per se, even a bad thing, it's just something you have to keep in mind.
The real issue is, they've been allowed and encouraged to run wild. It sounds super chauvinistic, but society used to keep women in check, and everyone was better off for it. Unchecked feminism is disaster, and if every woman is to some extent feminist...unchecked women is also a disaster.
In the old days, when 'men were men'...well, women were women. It was a different dynamic. Men absolutely got something out of it, because women were still fulfilling that role.
Andrew is spot on, although I think he could have stated some parts better and made it a clearer and more compelling argument.
It's wild, and it's also crazy that 'go to war' was at the top of her list. She's willing to let us go fight and die for her, while openly saying she owes nothing. Much based, such trad.
You really don’t see based women because they are, first and foremost, not extroverted (aka attention-seeking). The only thing that reliably prompts public displays from based women is an attack on her man or her children.
This "clip" is 40 minutes long, that's hardly a clip. God forbid you link to the fucking line you are referring to. Nah, too much trouble so let's all watch 40 some minutes of a bunch of morons blathering. That's the ticket.
What kinda asshole even watches this dumb shit to get angry at it in the first place?
The timestamp (7:21) works when I view within a browser, but yeah when I open in the app it starts at the beginning.
Using a mobile browser, not getting the timestamp, but do appreciate the reply. Ultimately, I simply don't care what any of these morons have to say in the first place, and can't figure out why anyone else does either.
Seems this video amounts to dumb woman says dumb thing, which is hardly news. If a woman has her mouth open, she's saying something idiotic, we hardly need video proof or a wider discussion about it.