Forget sunk cost, this is straight up labor theory of value. These people have spent infinity dollars and hours on projects that are actively harmful to our lives. Stopping those projects isn’t “abandoning investments” - it’s preventing further evil.
Some of these projects we've worked on for two or three years and now they're going to cut our funding? That's wasteful.
How is this bitch that fucking old and has never heard of the sunk cost fallacy
In a lot of cases, it's not even simply sunk cost fallacy.
If your "project" was to break windows and you're only half way through, stopping your "project" is 100% preventing future loss. And I suspect that a lot of these "projects" are closer to purely detrimental than they are to break-even beneficial.
Bet. Go ahead and lie your ass off about what you did last week dumbass, let's see what happens.
If they cared about this woman in particular because of her silly rant, they could verify the answers, but that was not the point of the exercise in general. It was to track how many don't reply at all, and probably aggregate the responses to get a general idea of tasks per department. Only outliers would be looked at individually. She just made herself an outlier.
How is this bitch that fucking old and has never heard of the sunk cost fallacy
Bet. Go ahead and lie your ass off about what you did last week dumbass, let's see what happens.
Forget sunk cost, this is straight up labor theory of value. These people have spent infinity dollars and hours on projects that are actively harmful to our lives. Stopping those projects isn’t “abandoning investments” - it’s preventing further evil.
In a lot of cases, it's not even simply sunk cost fallacy.
If your "project" was to break windows and you're only half way through, stopping your "project" is 100% preventing future loss. And I suspect that a lot of these "projects" are closer to purely detrimental than they are to break-even beneficial.
If they cared about this woman in particular because of her silly rant, they could verify the answers, but that was not the point of the exercise in general. It was to track how many don't reply at all, and probably aggregate the responses to get a general idea of tasks per department. Only outliers would be looked at individually. She just made herself an outlier.