So is unfurling a 30 foot "Black Lives Matter" over American embassy's.
Or at least, only for immediate practical considerations, it is meaningless.
What this symbolism represents is a kind of cultural conquest. These do have value because if you don't beat back Leftist symbolism, it will give them power over culture.
That is an ideological conquest, like renaming Fort Bragg. That is worth doing, and is in fact imperative. This does nothing, and looks quite silly, to be honest.
Your example is a re-conquest. This is not. It's our own conquest. And I believe it's target is to upset the "Bronze" National Socialists who run most of our immigration policies.
So is unfurling a 30 foot "Black Lives Matter" over American embassy's.
Or at least, only for immediate practical considerations, it is meaningless.
What this symbolism represents is a kind of cultural conquest. These do have value because if you don't beat back Leftist symbolism, it will give them power over culture.
That is an ideological conquest, like renaming Fort Bragg. That is worth doing, and is in fact imperative. This does nothing, and looks quite silly, to be honest.
Your example is a re-conquest. This is not. It's our own conquest. And I believe it's target is to upset the "Bronze" National Socialists who run most of our immigration policies.
Really you don't see any ideological motivations to renaming the Gulf of Mexico? Guess someone was just bored