Jail "pardoned" people for admission of guilt per precedent decisions on the acceptance of pardons. edit: guilt no longer implied per 2021 ruling on a previous Trump pardon.
Fuck the legal system, go dig up some Luigis and turn them loose. FBI has a file with thousands and thousands of patsies waiting to be handed free DDM4s and Eotechs.
Midnight armed raids, seize documents, arrest for whatever reason you like (blanket pardons cover all crimes y'know), build respective cases.
Perhaps guilt admission is no longer part of pardoning, but pardoning itself implies potential criminal action to be investigated.
There are substantial differences between legislative immunity and a pardon; the latter carries an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it, while the former is noncommittal, and tantamount to silence of the witness.
In 2021 the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals set new precedent and ruled President Trump’s pardon of Clint Lorance did not imply guilt. That ruling has been cited as precedent in a 5th Circuit ruling.
Consider this act of "lawfare":
for admission of guilt per precedent decisions on the acceptance of pardons.edit: guilt no longer implied per 2021 ruling on a previous Trump pardon.Fuck the legal system, go dig up some Luigis and turn them loose. FBI has a file with thousands and thousands of patsies waiting to be handed free DDM4s and Eotechs.
Please don't get me wrong about my desire. Our difference here is what we consider to be a "worse" punishment, ultimately with timing.
Transfer all the USSS agents still on the payroll as the detail for the Bidens and see what happens.
I'm not quite getting how Part 3 is supposed to work.
Midnight armed raids, seize documents, arrest for whatever reason you like (blanket pardons cover all crimes y'know), build respective cases.
Perhaps guilt admission is no longer part of pardoning, but pardoning itself implies potential criminal action to be investigated.
Burdick v. United States (1915):
But it was dicta so still debatable if precedent.
That has been countered in 2021: https://xcancel.com/JayOrsi/status/1881358908109000948
Ah. Thanks.
They could still try to argue it again and go all the way to SCOTUS though, right? Not to say it wouldn't be a waste of time.