This is my problem with this whole debate. Yes I acknowledge that young people face serious challenges starting out in the workforce. Yes I agree that we are importing foreigners to take American jobs and that is hideously evil and unfair.
Once we’ve agreed on that, what then? What is a young adult supposed to actually do tomorrow? What is your plan? Complaining about it incessantly on Twitter is not a plan. Calling for policy solutions is fine and I agree that we should work on those. But what about tomorrow? What is the demoralized young person supposed to actually do in his life tomorrow?
I say that he must get up in spite of it all, get the best job he possibly can, and work as hard he can to achieve what he can. He has a difficult road. Far from the most difficult compared to the vast majority of humans who have ever lived on Earth, but difficult. I acknowledge that. But he still has to get up and walk. What else would we have him do?
Listen Matt, this is very simple. You don't need to tell young white men to get up and walk. People learn how to do that by age 2. You need to start fighting to abolish the H-1B visa program.
Yes, you're one of the few Con Inc influencers who says H-1Bs should be stopped. But strangely enough, you spend your time defending the ones who think it's amazing? Why?
Get to work ending the H-1B, or shut up.
No Walsh is telling men in general that. He persist that men just have to stoically take any shit thrown their way. Not sure why you're trying to make it a race issue when Walsh is one the few mainstream voices consistently advocating for white people. He just doesn't extend the same to men as an individual group which is his biggest flaw in my opinion
Wrong.
Matt Walsh is making the wrong conclusions with limited data. If you take the issue in totality, what I said is correct. This issue is entirely connected to race.
Other races are still granted their natural rights, to associate with whom they chose, to group up with whom they chose, to collectivize along racial lines, to espouse for their racial interests, to protect themselves from dangers and threats, to protect their neighbors and people, to gatekeep out undesirables. All of these natural rights are being denied White people. A group, regardless of size or purpose, can't exist without the natural rights necessary to maintain that group. If all of the natural rights necessary to maintain a group are being denied to White people, then we, as individuals, families, communities, jobs, churches, states, nations, and as a people, will cease to exist. The demographic trends since the 60s prove this. The rampant anti-White propaganda proves this. The media and government coverup of non-white on White crime proves this. The welfare use of non-whites proves this. The explicit importation of non-whites into White countries proves this. The explicit hiring of non-whites over more competent Whites proves this. The overwhelming number of jobs in recent years only going to non-whites proves this. ESG and DEI proves this. Affirmative action and diversity proves this. The "oppressor vs oppressed" narrative (i.e. Whites = oppressor and non-whites = oppressed) proves this. The media propaganda proves this. The dozens of NGOs specifically funding and helping non-whites get into White countries, en masse, proves this. The demonization of White people in history, if the rules were applied equally to all races, would damn them more, proves this. I can't conjure a single instance in Western civilization, nor all its institutions now, that is explicitly to the benefit of White people. Can you think of one?
On face value, Matt Walsh is correct that, as men, we must be stoics and tolerate a lot of shit, for the greater good of the collective. That's why Western civilization rose to the height that it did, because of our ability to tolerate. But, tolerance, in itself, isn't a virtue. It depends on the situation. If our societies and institutions become corrupt, tolerance is the worst thing we could do. You don't tolerate lies, wrong, and evil, you refute it, correct it, and destroy it.
Matt Walsh, as a mainstream right winger, is intentionally ignoring the larger issues of inflation, and arguing that we keep doing more of the same, work harder and harder to maintain a system that is incredibly corrupt and antagonistic toward us, and our people. That is the wrong position.
My guy how the fuck am I wrong when he does talk about everything you listed then throws it out the window when applied to solely men. Although he's also being a hypocrite on the inflation issue anyway since he's been railing against it for half a year prior. Maybe it's just lip service but I've listened to the man rant about the exact issues you're talking about. He's the only person I still watch at DW because he does talk about it. I'm not white but I'm pretty sure as a Christian male I'd be next on the chopping block after white people
Men need to take back power and the weight of society or we're doomed. We also need the privileges back though and being quiet about it won't work. He might be backtracking but his video commentary on it is that he thinks redpill is too doomer which I agree with.
Agreed. Repeal the 19th.
Men have never NOT had the weight of society. Litterly for not a single second of recorded history.
Every society that has stopped rewarding them for that collapsea within a few decades. Nobody ever picks up the slack, and nobody ever will.
Either pay your men or die. Thats the conversation, its simple as that