I think the legal action is appropriate based on what they allow their staff to say. My example of Picard is really a good example. It was torn to shreds as woke bullshit. This campaign against them tarnished their image.
Really? What exactly did they allow their staff to say? I'm sure you wouldn't say so if they were just pointing out weird congruencies with Google search and saying that it's not good journalism to spam articles for high visibility. That would be rather tame for a legal threat.
I think the legal action is appropriate based on what they allow their staff to say. My example of Picard is really a good example. It was torn to shreds as woke bullshit. This campaign against them tarnished their image.
Really? What exactly did they allow their staff to say? I'm sure you wouldn't say so if they were just pointing out weird congruencies with Google search and saying that it's not good journalism to spam articles for high visibility. That would be rather tame for a legal threat.