Has anyone noticed that in most countries, when you get female leaders they're always getting in from 'the right'?
Like they could turn out to be ineffectual, globalist shills or some of the biggest hardass bitches only caring about THEIR country but the left always scream 'muh sexism' but never chose women that actually inspire leadership qualities.
When your culture is one that repeats the mantra "women are less, women are least, women are oppressed minorities who can't think for themselves, act for themselves, or have their own agency", like The Left does, then you tend to surround yourself with those whom you've selected for, who look at that mantra and say to themselves "sounds about right, I AM useless!".
when the modern left chooses a woman, they pigeon hole themselves into "our candidate is a woman therefore automatically deserves the position". Many people rightfully see this as bratty and entitled.
Gabbard tried to run an actual campaign, and left smeared her as a Russian puppet for it.
Good point plus you need a strong woman who can run a campaign and leadership WITHOUT relying on the crutch of being a woman to pave a path for future candidates.
Hillary and Kamala were definitely not that, if the dems weren't as corrupt and shortsighted that they let Gabbard win nomination and probably win 2020 with the cheats already set up then female president would be a non issue after her, sort of like the UK after Thatcher.
Which is why I don't think they'll EVER alow a non puppet female to run as president as they need the donation angle if 'first female president'
Oh yeah don't get me wrong, NONE have lived up to her but then again a LOT of male leaders have been shit too.
But the important thing is having a benchmark to compare to and for men we've have GREAT leaders over the centuries to easily say "you're not as good as him, do better" which is why it's important to have a good first female leader candidate otherwise you end up with Obama and I notice America ain't rushing to have another Black guy leading them...
In the remake of Manchurian Candidate, Meryl Streep plays an evil power hungry cunt. Meryl Streep modelled the part after Karen Hughes from the Bush administration. Her hairdo and clothes straight from Karen's photos and press conferences. But since she was playing an evil power hungry cunt. Everyone asked her why she played Hillary so evil.
On screen was an evil power hungry cunt, and everyone saw Hillary. I knew then, she'd never be President.
Has anyone noticed that in most countries, when you get female leaders they're always getting in from 'the right'?
Like they could turn out to be ineffectual, globalist shills or some of the biggest hardass bitches only caring about THEIR country but the left always scream 'muh sexism' but never chose women that actually inspire leadership qualities.
When your culture is one that repeats the mantra "women are less, women are least, women are oppressed minorities who can't think for themselves, act for themselves, or have their own agency", like The Left does, then you tend to surround yourself with those whom you've selected for, who look at that mantra and say to themselves "sounds about right, I AM useless!".
when the modern left chooses a woman, they pigeon hole themselves into "our candidate is a woman therefore automatically deserves the position". Many people rightfully see this as bratty and entitled.
Gabbard tried to run an actual campaign, and left smeared her as a Russian puppet for it.
Good point plus you need a strong woman who can run a campaign and leadership WITHOUT relying on the crutch of being a woman to pave a path for future candidates.
Hillary and Kamala were definitely not that, if the dems weren't as corrupt and shortsighted that they let Gabbard win nomination and probably win 2020 with the cheats already set up then female president would be a non issue after her, sort of like the UK after Thatcher.
Which is why I don't think they'll EVER alow a non puppet female to run as president as they need the donation angle if 'first female president'
Every female PM since Thatcher was an embarrassment. Thatcher was a product of her time, a baroness and matriarch, unlike today's cunty bitches.
Oh yeah don't get me wrong, NONE have lived up to her but then again a LOT of male leaders have been shit too.
But the important thing is having a benchmark to compare to and for men we've have GREAT leaders over the centuries to easily say "you're not as good as him, do better" which is why it's important to have a good first female leader candidate otherwise you end up with Obama and I notice America ain't rushing to have another Black guy leading them...
Kinda off point, .... but.
In the remake of Manchurian Candidate, Meryl Streep plays an evil power hungry cunt. Meryl Streep modelled the part after Karen Hughes from the Bush administration. Her hairdo and clothes straight from Karen's photos and press conferences. But since she was playing an evil power hungry cunt. Everyone asked her why she played Hillary so evil.
On screen was an evil power hungry cunt, and everyone saw Hillary. I knew then, she'd never be President.