90 minute interview, summarized into plot points, no statements as to accuracy, just what was said:
He does not consider the USA to be at war with Russia (re:Ukraine stuff), but acknowledges their involvement as an involved third party which he isn't a fan of.
He likes the economic sanctions, because it galvanizes and lionizes Russian unity and Russia-first philosophies, but concedes that a lot of the population would prefer it goes away.
Russia has made new fancy super-missiles, that have built in warnings to the USA when they're fired to let them know they're just fancy super-missiles, not nukes. He is very proud of this accomplishment.
He says the infamous poisoning of the turncoat spy case was treated very oddly by German intelligence officials and that Russia has asked them to release his medical/autopsy info but Germany did not give it to Russia, but doesn't really expand on that further.
He brings up that when you look at Isreal's incursion conflict compared to Russia's incursion conflict, Isreal has far, far more civilian deaths on the invaded side, more in a year than the entire Russo-Ukraine war, which "should" showcase how they're not in a war of extermination, they "care about the innocents".
Notes that Trump is democratically elected (unlike Zelensky) and therefore is open to contact and negotiations, but Biden never engaged in such talks, he hopes Trump might but given the last term he ran he isn't hopeful.
Also, while not a major point, he actually uses the word "Russophobic" to describe Zelensky, and brings up a few case examples of it, I guess to cater to all the leftists watching Tucker Carlson.
My favorite irony is PBS NewsHour having a democrat on their politics roundtable tell us what democrats think, followed up by a democrat telling us what republicans think.
Like they think Victoria Nuland can present Russia's position better than Russia itself can?
No, both cases they just don't people to hear what the "enemy" actually has to say.
They do that with everything. I remember and article ages ago where washington post (or someone like that, wish I could find it) did a fake interview with a Trump supporter. They didn't go out an interview one mind you, they just came up with a bunch of responses that they thought a Trump supporter would say and argued against those points.
There’s Radio Moskow for that, Tucker doesn’t need to take away a honest Russian’s work, for sure he’s receiving sumthin for his services, a whole lot more than the 5 kopek army at work here. Aren’t you a bit jealous?
What are the highlights?
They go to the super market and see bread for the first time
90 minute interview, summarized into plot points, no statements as to accuracy, just what was said:
He does not consider the USA to be at war with Russia (re:Ukraine stuff), but acknowledges their involvement as an involved third party which he isn't a fan of.
He likes the economic sanctions, because it galvanizes and lionizes Russian unity and Russia-first philosophies, but concedes that a lot of the population would prefer it goes away.
Russia has made new fancy super-missiles, that have built in warnings to the USA when they're fired to let them know they're just fancy super-missiles, not nukes. He is very proud of this accomplishment.
He says the infamous poisoning of the turncoat spy case was treated very oddly by German intelligence officials and that Russia has asked them to release his medical/autopsy info but Germany did not give it to Russia, but doesn't really expand on that further.
He brings up that when you look at Isreal's incursion conflict compared to Russia's incursion conflict, Isreal has far, far more civilian deaths on the invaded side, more in a year than the entire Russo-Ukraine war, which "should" showcase how they're not in a war of extermination, they "care about the innocents".
Notes that Trump is democratically elected (unlike Zelensky) and therefore is open to contact and negotiations, but Biden never engaged in such talks, he hopes Trump might but given the last term he ran he isn't hopeful.
Also, while not a major point, he actually uses the word "Russophobic" to describe Zelensky, and brings up a few case examples of it, I guess to cater to all the leftists watching Tucker Carlson.
Tucker being as naïve about Putin’s regime as E. Michael Jones about the ayatollah’s.
Lavrov, Peskov — they don’t even need to ask Putin what’s what, they KNOW what Putin thinks. I wonder what’s the use of such an interview anyway.
Edit: Hi, 55 Savushkina Street St. Petersburg! 😂
Allowing an english speaking audience to hear a perspective that's not in complete lockstep with western propaganda.
My favorite irony is PBS NewsHour having a democrat on their politics roundtable tell us what democrats think, followed up by a democrat telling us what republicans think.
Like they think Victoria Nuland can present Russia's position better than Russia itself can?
No, both cases they just don't people to hear what the "enemy" actually has to say.
They do that with everything. I remember and article ages ago where washington post (or someone like that, wish I could find it) did a fake interview with a Trump supporter. They didn't go out an interview one mind you, they just came up with a bunch of responses that they thought a Trump supporter would say and argued against those points.
There’s Radio Moskow for that, Tucker doesn’t need to take away a honest Russian’s work, for sure he’s receiving sumthin for his services, a whole lot more than the 5 kopek army at work here. Aren’t you a bit jealous?
Say hello to your supervisors @ 55 Savushkina St.
Oh, you're one of those brainwashed NAFO boomers. Got it.