Globalist money is pushing destructive policies on countries, but i've noticed that people on the right don't want to say this because it sounds too much like being against capitalism.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Capitalism is simply a means to an end, the end being a fair distribution of resources proportionate to each individual's net positive contribution to a cooperative society.
Capitalism provides an approximation of that through money. But like many approximations, it's imperfect and prone to drift. That drift does mean it needs recalibration occasionally, and sometimes that recalibration can look like the kind of political "recalibration" old empires go through once they drift too far from the ideals that made them great.
I am committed to that the end goal as an ideal, and committed to capitalism as the means only insomuch as it is the best fitting approximation we've made so far. If a (proven) better approximation emerges instead of a re-zeroing and calibration, I'm willing to consider it.