Which is stupid, if they wanted to do that, don't do this 'arthouse' shit, do this
Do an advert of a suave older gentleman, taking his younger girlfriend to a hotel whilst hitting on the maids there, and at checkout after nicking the toiletries and batteries in the room, his girlfriend pays as he loads the boot and warms up the jaaaag.
There's a school of thought in advertising that it's higher class to not show the product. Had a few friends in advertising that thought that way
Which is stupid, if they wanted to do that, don't do this 'arthouse' shit, do this
Do an advert of a suave older gentleman, taking his younger girlfriend to a hotel whilst hitting on the maids there, and at checkout after nicking the toiletries and batteries in the room, his girlfriend pays as he loads the boot and warms up the jaaaag.
Sales will be up 300%!!
This is an advert meant to win awards not sell products. They're usually completely nonsensical and artsy
Reminds of the 'how is this meant to sell burgers?' meme.
Wait, they have awards for advertising?
There are self-fellating industry awards for everything.
yes. But it's not based on which ads sell more. It's about artistic direction
They're not selling "cars" to people they're trying to convince the Jaguar brand is still worth buying. They're selling a long-dead image.
let me guess, they worked in the perfume industry
For advertising firms. Not sure what their main focus was but I dont think it was just for perfume. I know they did some electronic chain stores
Idiots trying to be smart is the funniest joke of the 21st century.