I don’t know much about civil proceedings, so I hope someone can help me out. The whole legal proceedings against Mr. Jones were obviously a politically motivated persecution of him with the express goal of silencing him. I don’t think there is any question about that. Now, I don’t know if anything he said actually rises to an actual standard of defamation or damage against any of the plaintiffs, but even if it did no reasonable person would ever believe he did over a billion dollars in damages to the plaintiffs. That is entirely absurd, and the award that was given to the plaintiffs was clearly designed to utterly destroy Mr. Jones in perpetuity.
My question is this…it would seem to me that on appeal that even if the verdict against Mr. Jones was not overturned the damages awarded to the plaintiffs would surely be reduced by a very substantial amount, because anyone who look at it reasonably can tell what’s being done. I mean, hell, they’re rigging the auction of their property to make sure it goes into “approved” hands. So, why hasn’t he appealed?
Here is the key thing you need to know about both CT and TX trials:
They were default judgements for failing to produce discovery that he didn't even have access to.
Neither of his cases were ever decided on the merits.
This is why he was never allowed to present any sort of defense at the "trials," and was, in fact, threatened with contempt of court if he even tried. His guilt was already determined, the trials were about the damages.
We see how that went.
I don't know if either of his cases are on appeal, but if they were not, he needs to fire his lawyers.
Robert Barnes has an epic rant about this on Viva's Rumble channel, somewhere. I will see if I can find it.
Here is a YT video about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDnYVPq7Q4c
I think his lawyers both tried to mount a defence and were threatened by the judge themselves for simply pointing out how stupid it was to default judgement him.
The recent Onion shit shows how hard they were rushing to destroy him before he COULD appeal like they tried to do with Trump. And luckily like Trump, they appear to have fucked up.
It's more that they underestimated how cunning Alex is/was.
The Supplement Company that is bidding on InfoWars is run by Alex's dad. That same company also is the majority debtor for InfoWars. That means that even in Bankruptcy, that is the company that has to be paid first. It is the same company that just filed a complaint against The Onion's bid at auction. That is why the persecutors colluded with The Onion in the first place. If they hadn't have done that, InfoWars would just be owned by Alex's dad.
Apparently the judge on the case is the same one who indicted the governor of Texas for vetoing a bill. Since only the legislature can override a veto, that is a clear usurpation of authority and grounds for removal. Blatantly corrupt.
The cases are in the process of being appealed, but due to (what I would consider) arcane legal procedure, the sales have to go through before the appeal process can properly begin.
Which means we go back to a "you can't un-rape the dog" scenario. It is very likely that the CT case will not be reversed on appeal even though it's an illegal case, because of the insane partisanship of both the appellate court and the State Supreme Court, meaning a run at SCOTUS would be the only possible answer there. The appellate court in Texas is also bad, but the Texas Supreme Court might be better. Either way: the damages done by the courts, prosecutions, and judges is likely permanent even if he wins an appeal, which simply restarts the proceedings against him and they keep trying to make him kill himself.
Even complaints to the Bar Association won't work because most State Bar Associations are Leftist terror organizations at this point. They are hyperpartisan and pushing Leftism hard, they've been doing it for years.
The only way this stops this is something like what we saw with Fanni Willis where the case was so bad that the Appellate Court looked like they were about to sanction the government attorneys. Except in this case, it can't be a maybe. It needs to be heavy sanctions and a recommendation to their state disciplinary council.