I don’t know much about civil proceedings, so I hope someone can help me out. The whole legal proceedings against Mr. Jones were obviously a politically motivated persecution of him with the express goal of silencing him. I don’t think there is any question about that. Now, I don’t know if anything he said actually rises to an actual standard of defamation or damage against any of the plaintiffs, but even if it did no reasonable person would ever believe he did over a billion dollars in damages to the plaintiffs. That is entirely absurd, and the award that was given to the plaintiffs was clearly designed to utterly destroy Mr. Jones in perpetuity.
My question is this…it would seem to me that on appeal that even if the verdict against Mr. Jones was not overturned the damages awarded to the plaintiffs would surely be reduced by a very substantial amount, because anyone who look at it reasonably can tell what’s being done. I mean, hell, they’re rigging the auction of their property to make sure it goes into “approved” hands. So, why hasn’t he appealed?
The cases are in the process of being appealed, but due to (what I would consider) arcane legal procedure, the sales have to go through before the appeal process can properly begin.
Which means we go back to a "you can't un-rape the dog" scenario. It is very likely that the CT case will not be reversed on appeal even though it's an illegal case, because of the insane partisanship of both the appellate court and the State Supreme Court, meaning a run at SCOTUS would be the only possible answer there. The appellate court in Texas is also bad, but the Texas Supreme Court might be better. Either way: the damages done by the courts, prosecutions, and judges is likely permanent even if he wins an appeal, which simply restarts the proceedings against him and they keep trying to make him kill himself.
Even complaints to the Bar Association won't work because most State Bar Associations are Leftist terror organizations at this point. They are hyperpartisan and pushing Leftism hard, they've been doing it for years.
The only way this stops this is something like what we saw with Fanni Willis where the case was so bad that the Appellate Court looked like they were about to sanction the government attorneys. Except in this case, it can't be a maybe. It needs to be heavy sanctions and a recommendation to their state disciplinary council.